Pt. San Pedro Rd. Coalition
Box 449
369 "B" Third Street
San Rafael, CA 94901

San Rafael Rock Quarry Committee

space

News

space
POSTED
SUBJECT
November 4, 2009 An article in the News Pointer titled "Quarry moves forward with EIR approval" by Paul Jones discusses the Marin Board of Supervisors vote to certify the Quarry EIR. It also covers the position of the Coalition, the Quarry owners and the County regarding the EIR and the next steps.
October 29, 2009 An open letter from Coalition Co-president, Bonnie Marmor, about the Marin County Board of Supervisors vote on October 27, 2009 certifying the San Rafael Rock Quarry Final EIR and the next steps by the County to determine the merits of the project and what restrictions will be imposed on Quarry operations and reclamation.
October 27, 2009 Marin IJ article titled "Supervisors approve quarry's environmental impact report" by Richard Halstead describes the Marin County Board of Supervisors hearing on the Final EIR resulting in a vote certifying that report. This article describes the events at that meeting.
October 27, 2009 The Marin County Board of Supervisors voted to certify the San Rafael Rock Quarry Final EIR at a public hearing today. A video of that hearing can be viewed online at
http://www.co.marin.ca.us/depts/BS/Archive/Meetings.cfm

(click on the 10/27/09 Video entry and then scroll down the agenda and click on Item 17).
October 26, 2009 Marin IJ MARIN VOICE article by Judi Shils, Paul Schramski and Debbi Friedman expressing their concern with the health risks to the community of the proposed operations and expansion of the Quarry and urge the County Supervisors to seriously consider these issues in their upcoming vote on the Final EIR.
October 24, 2009 Put health and safety first
Bonnie Marmor and David Crutcher, Pt. San Pedro Road Coalition

Aimi Dutra of the San Rafael Rock Quarry last week unfairly accused the Pt. San Pedro Road Coalition of ignoring scientific evidence, fear mongering and exerting political pressure.

Three highly respected physicians, concerned about toxic quarry emissions, wrote to local physicians asking them to support their call for an epidemiological study, continuous air quality monitoring and limiting quarry dust distribution.

Quarry owners spent huge sums of money for a study they controlled, and for PR that glosses over the very real threat quarry operations bring to our community. "Peer reviews" of the study by biased, pro-industry doctors hired by the quarry provide no reason to trust the study's conclusions.

If the quarry poses no health risk as it claims, it should not object to continuous air monitoring and to an epidemiological study. These are sensible measures given that proposed quarry operations include 250 daily truck trips and ongoing blasts which result in dissemination of diesel and crystalline silica, both Proposition 65 carcinogens, while refusing to enclose dust-producing operations.

The quarry wins over local residents by funding school projects. We applaud these acts of corporate charity which offset some of the unpaid county taxes and fees for the quarry's 11 unpermitted buildings that the quarry was forced to remove. They are not, however, a substitute for a safe operation. It is the quarry that exerts political pressure, not the coalition.

The quarry is a large business and its owners make major political contributions far and wide. The coalition, in contrast, is a grassroots organization of volunteers who care about the health of the community and the environment in which they reside.

We hope that our supervisors will put our environment and the health and safety of the community ahead of financial considerations when voting on the quarry's EIR on Oct. 27.

LIBRARY Additional articles and reference materials can be found in the San Rafael Rock Quarry Committee Library.